USPTO serial 79426915
AUGMEDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOX III, LYAL L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AUGMEDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
Todd A. Denys Mandelbaum Barrett PC3 Becker Farm Road, Suite 105Roseland, NJ 07068United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Medical training simulators comprised of downloadable computer software, including 3D augmented and extended reality software, augmented reality software for use in medical and surgical training and planning and during surgical procedures; Downloadable augmented reality software for medical teaching and training as well as intra-operative visualisation and navigation; Downloadable educational software featuring instruction in medical imaging, surgical planning and augmented reality assisted surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices used as accessory to register 3D models and holograms on patients | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design and development, namely computer software and augmented reality software for use in medical and surgical training for medical teaching and training purposes as well as intra-operative visualisation and navigation purposes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing, visualising and analysing medical imaging data for surgical planning, medical education and intra operative guidance and visualisation; Information technology services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems relating to medical and augmented reality software; Providing user authentication services for online medical and augmented reality software applications; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and consulting in the field of medical imaging, augmented reality and surgical visualisation technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |