USPTO serial 79427338
ORFIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ORFIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Artificial intelligence software; artificial intelligence software for analysis; software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data; reporting software; music software; musical recordings; computer software for processing digital music files; software; programming software; computer software to enable retrieval of data; computer software to enable searching and retrieval of data; data mining software; data management software; audio visual recordings. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | statistical analysis and reporting, namely, provision of music usage reports; statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence technology consultancy; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; research in the field of artificial intelligence; research in the field of data processing technology; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence for automated content identification, usage analysis, rights matching, metadata processing, and reporting in the field of digital media and audiovisual content; expert reporting services relating to technology, namely, analysis and reporting on computer software systems, data processing platforms, artificial intelligence models, and digital media technology performance; advice and development services relating to computer software; advisory and information services relating to computer software; computer programming; computer software design; design and development of data processing programs; design of information systems relating to management; development of databases; software engineering; software development; web-based software application using artificial intelligence for metadata matching about music usage- audio recognition; web-based software using artificial intelligence for analysis of music metadata facilitating monitoring of music usage; web-based software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data; web-based music software for music usage monitoring and management of metadata; musical recordings; web-based computer software for processing digital music files; web-based programming software for programming of data processing workflows, content identification logic, rights-matching rules, and automated data classification pipelines in software systems; web-based computer software to enable retrieval of retrieval of digital media data, metadata, audiovisual usage data, ownership data, and rights information from databases and cloud-based information systems; web-based computer software to enable searching and retrieval of searching and retrieval of digital media content metadata, audiovisual usage data, ownership records, and rights management information from electronic databases; web-based software for data mining of large-scale audiovisual usage datasets, metadata repositories, and rights ownership data for analytics, reporting, and content identification purposes; web-based data management software for management, structuring, validation, and normalization of digital media metadata, usage data, and rights ownership information within data platforms; web-based software for accessing audiovisual recordings featuring music and music-related content | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing services relating to music publishing, namely, music licensing services for the authorization, administration, and management of music usage rights across audiovisual, broadcast, and digital media platforms; copyright management; copyright licensing; licensing of intellectual property and copyright; copyright licensing agency services; providing information on agencies for copyright licensing; copyright licensing facilitating advisory services relating to copyright; consultancy relating to the licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |