Drawing for CYIENTIFIQ

USPTO serial 79428294

CYIENTIFIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYIENTIFIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlene A. Azema

Charlene A. Azema Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorKnobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLPIrvine, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software; graphical user interface software; artificial intelligence software for analysis; intelligent getaways for real-time data analysis; machine learning software for analysis; machine learning software used in computer predictive analytics programs; electronic databases recorded on computer media; mobile application software; downloadable mobile applications; downloadable electronic publications; computer peripherals and hardware; all of the above limited to digital solutions, embedded software, network planning and operations, vlsi, enterprise system integration, development of graphical user interface software, design and analysis of artificial intelligence modules to provide real-time insights, and machine learning modelling algorithms for predictive analytics and maintenance.ACTIVE—
035Business consulting services; business information management services; outsourcing services.ACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis, research and design services; engineering services; engineering design services; design and design or technological consulting services in the fields of electronic computer products and components, telecommunications, transportation and aeronautics; packaging design services; research and development of new products; quality assurance services; software as a service; hosting of computer software; computer services, namely computer application and network design, development, maintenance and support services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware problems; analysis of technical data in the field of communications and computer systems; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 12, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance