USPTO serial 79428644
INNOPULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARRETT, LEAH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOPULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina J. Danielson
Sabrina J. Danielson Holland & Hart LLPP.O. BOX 8749Denver, CO 80201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electro-stimulation apparatus for skin and facial muscles for use in aesthetic and cosmetic therapeutic treatment; electrical stimulation apparatus for the face for aesthetic cosmetic facial treatments; electrical stimulation apparatus for the skin for skin regeneration treatment; electrical stimulation apparatus for the body for aesthetic and cosmetic skin treatments; electrical stimulation apparatus for the skin for aesthetic and cosmetic rejuvenation treatment; apparatus for electrical muscle stimulation for medical purposes; electronic muscle stimulators for medical use; electronic muscle stimulators for cosmetic use; medical apparatus for the relief of pain, namely, electrical stimulation and massage apparatus for migraine, neuropathic pain, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), skin treatment, skin regeneration, skin rejuvenation, and diagnoses of conditions treated through neuromodulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |