USPTO serial 79428788
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather; leather, unworked or semi-worked; duffle bags; clutch purses; coin holders in the nature of wallets; wallets; credit card holders made of leather; keycases; rucksacks; all purpose sports bags; haversacks; beach bags; carrying cases for documents; shopping bags with wheels attached; textile shopping bags; school satchels; suitcases; sports bags; duffel bags; shoulder bags; bum-bags; cosmetic bags sold empty; traveling trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas; walking sticks; parasols; leads for animals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |