USPTO serial 79429731
FLUIDSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with FLUIDSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, PA60 Ocean Boulevard, Suite 3Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectrometers, other than for medical purposes, namely, for measuring lubricating and hydraulic fluid health; electronic fluid condition monitoring systems comprising electronic sensors, fluorescence spectroscopy sensors and video monitors for real-time analysis and diagnostics of lubricating oils and other machinery fluids; electronic system comprising optical sensors, electrical sensors, inductive sensors, optical scanning components, embedded electronic hardware and firmware, and software for installation in industrial equipment, engines, turbines, and other machinery for monitoring, analysis, diagnostics, and for condition-based and predictive-based maintenance of lubricating oils and other machinery fluids; electronic sensors for analyzing the properties of fluids and for detecting and quantifying debris particles in fluids; integrated electronic signal processing units in the nature of electronic digital signal processors, electronic circuits and microchips for interpreting fluorescence and electrical data and providing digital or analog outputs; predictive maintenance devices, namely, optical sensors, electrical sensors, inductive sensors and optical scanners with embedded electronic hardware and software for assessing fluid quality and other properties in engines, turbines, and industrial machinery for use in a wide range of industrial and commercial sectors, including marine, aerospace, automotive, oil and gas, and energy industries; downloadable and recorded software for monitoring, analyzing and collecting data from a fluid health, properties and contamination detection system. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |