USPTO serial 79429875
EZSERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with EZSERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | artificial limbs, eyes and teeth and artificial lenses for implantation in the eye; orthopedic articles, namely, orthopedic apparatus and instruments for diagnostic and therapeutic use; intraocular lenses; intraocular lenses for surgical implantation; intraocular prostheses, namely, lenses for surgical implantation; intraocular prostheses, namely, intraocular lenses for surgical implantation; intraocular injection devices and intraocular injection devices preloaded with intraocular lens; intraocular lens injection devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |