USPTO serial 79430814
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, processed meat, frozen meat products, meat extracts; sausages; meat paste; meat-based spreads; fish, not live; processed fish, fishery products, frozen fish; dried fish; frozen sea foods, frozen shell fish, processed sea food; canned sea food; poultry and game; dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; frozen vegetables; canned vegetables; milk and milk products; jams, compotes, eggs, edible oils and fats. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale, retail, online retail store services featuring vegetarian, non-vegetarian, processed and un processed food stuffs, sea foods, fruits, vegetables and grains; professional staffing services; employment staffing consultation services; job and personnel placement; human resources services, namely, personnel selection for others; human resources services namely, recruiting and placing technical professionals and staff; employment staffing consultation services; employment agency services, namely, filling the temporary and permanent staffing needs of businesses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |