USPTO serial 79431489
VEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Toms, Esq.
Keith Toms, Esq. McCarter & English, LLP265 Franklin StBoston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Steam engine boilers; boiler tubes being parts of machines; structural and replacement parts for steam engine boilers; feeding apparatus being a part of steam engine boilers; steam operated power generators; turbines, other than for land vehicles; dust removing installations for cleaning purposes for waste heat recovery power generation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Industrial boilers, other than parts of machines for recovering heat from industrial exhaust gases for power generation; steam boilers, other than parts of machines, namely, waste heat recovery steam boilers for supplying process steam or hot water for power generation and industrial processes, including carbon dioxide (CO2) recovery and drying of industrial raw materials; electric boilers not being parts of machines; gas boilers not being parts of machines; heating boilers for recovering heat from industrial exhaust gases for power generation; all of these goods for waste heat recovery systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anhui Conch Kawasaki Engineering Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VEGA
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |