USPTO serial 79431755
CHEEZIOUS FINEST TASTE EVER...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OGUNFEMI, RASHEEDAT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEEZIOUS FINEST TASTE EVER...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing foods and drinks; restaurants, snack bars, food points, cafes, cafeterias, canteens, hotels, motels and bakery shops for providing foods and drinks of all kinds including pizzas, bakery products, cooked foods, fast foods, snack foods, prepared food and drinks, Chinese foods, burgers, kabab, tikkas, patties, sandwiches, samosas, bread, nans, pies, milk and milk products, tea, coffee, nonalcoholic drinks, fruit juices, milk shakes, ice creams, fresh and dry fruits, sauces; catering for marriage parties and other functions; temporary accommodations; services providing bed and board in hotels, boarding houses all being services falling in this class. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Faheem Ashraf
- Other trademarks owned by Imran Ijaz
- Other trademarks owned by Umer Farooq
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHEEZIOUS FINEST TASTE EVER...
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |