USPTO serial 79433677
CYBERHUNTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERHUNTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | IT services in the field of data privacy, data security and data protection; IT security, protection and restoration; data recovery services; information technology services; cloud-based data privacy, data security and data protection services; internet security consultancy and advice; computer security consultancy and advice; consultancy in the field of computer system analysis and advice; consultancy in the field of security software and advice; telecommunication network security consultancy and advice; authentication services for computer security; computer security system monitoring services; monitoring of network systems; maintenance of software; maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; provision of security services for computer networks, computer access and computerized transactions; computer system analysis; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; provision of computer security risk management programs; computer virus protection services; computer security services for protection against illegal network access; development of technologies for the protection of electronic networks; software security testing; ethical hacking; system and software vulnerability management, namely identifying, evaluating, treating, and reporting on security vulnerabilities in computer systems and software; cloud computing security services; data loss prevention services, namely data monitoring services, data detection services and data blocking services; software design and development; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for data privacy, data security and data protection; providing software for access management to personal data; computer services for controlling access to personal data; computer programming in the field of computer security, data security and risk management; software as a service [SaaS]; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for computer security; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for data removal and data management; platform as a service [PaaS]; platform as a service [PaaS] featuring software platforms for computer security; platform as a service [PaaS] featuring software platforms for data privacy, data security and data protection; platform as a service [PaaS] featuring software platforms for data removal and data management; providing temporary use of web-based applications; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer portal software. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |