USPTO serial 79433908
ECOLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, ALLYSON B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: 6 Nov 2026
Need help with ECOLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Office Action issues
The examiner has identified that you need to overcome a likelihood of confusion refusal and provide a clarified description for your goods.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lifting systems, lift systems and lifting equipment for land vehicles, as well as components for lifting systems, lift systems and lifting equipment for land vehicles; lifting columns; lifting bridges; loading ramps; roadway lifting bridges; built-in scissor lift for heavy land vehicles and heavy land equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |