USPTO serial 79434168
CT CONTEC INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, ALEXIS A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with CT CONTEC INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLCSuite 1, 14726 Bowfin Ter.Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management of computer databases; data processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair or maintenance of integrated circuits manufacturing machines and systems; installation of electrical wiring; maintenance and repair of computer hardware for industrial automation; maintenance services for industrial nuclear power, chemical, and wind power plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation, maintenance and updating of computer database software; engineering services in the field of computer programming; computer software technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; design and development of computer hardware and software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and computer software application problems; software engineering consultancy services; design and development of computer hardware architecture; research in the field of the computerised automation of technical processes; consultancy and information services relating to information technology (IT) architecture and infrastructure; information technology (IT) consultancy in the field of installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; computer software design; installation of computer software; digitization of documents; programming of energy management computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Contec BV
- Other trademarks owned by Contec BV
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CT CONTEC INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |