USPTO serial 79434191
CARINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL,JUNA QUEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Kreider Gaunt
Karen Kreider Gaunt Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and downloadable computer software for data collection, transmission, archiving, management and processing; data collection devices in the field of transportation, namely, license plate recognition apparatus, vehicular telematics data collection units, wireless signal interception and detection devices for vehicle surveillance, GPS-based vehicle tracking devices, roadside data acquisition units, and onboard diagnostic data capture devices; computers and downloadable computer software for data collection, transmission, archiving, management and processing in the field of transportation; data processing apparatus in the field of transportation, namely, vehicle intelligence data fusion servers, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven vehicle surveillance data analytics apparatus, multi-source vehicle data aggregation and processing machines, and real-time vehicle monitoring and anomaly detection processing units; electric sensors; digital cameras; camcorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for collection, transmission, archiving, management and processing of data in the field of transportation; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for collection, transmission, archiving, management and processing of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 31, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |