USPTO serial 79434270
PRO.SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARCIA, CLAUDIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PRO.SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP212 Carnegie Center, Suite 400Princeton, NJ 08540United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Yarns of aramid fibre, not for textile use; yarns of unidirectional aramid fibers for use in conjunction with thermoplastic or thermosetting resins for protection shields and general industrial applications; aramid rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica and goods made from these materials and not included in other classes, namely prefabricated shields and laminated plates composed of aramid fibers, rubber, gutta-percha, gum, and mica coated with different resin types or with rubber, for use in manufacturing ballistic, explosive, and fire repellant and protective clothing, systems, panels, and plates for hard armoring, building and vehicle armoring; plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacture; packing, fire repellant and insulating materials; flexible hoses, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | Yarns of aramid fibre, not for textile use; yarns of unidirectional aramid fibers for use in conjunction with thermoplastic or thermosetting resins for use in the production of protection shields and general industrial applications; aramid rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica for use in manufacturing ballistic, explosive, and fire repellant and protective clothing, systems, panels, and plates for hard armoring, building and vehicle armoring; plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacture; packing, fire repellant and insulating materials; flexible hoses, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabric, namely unidirectional multiaxial fabrics, flame resistant fabrics and fabric for advanced and industrial composites, namely parts of vehicles, structural panels; mixed fiber fabrics ; ballistic resistant fabrics for textile use in the production of bulletproof and blast proof clothing, shoes and bullet proof and blast proof garments and shields; ballistic fabrics for use in the production of bullet-proof clothing; fabrics for use in the production of slash resistant clothing; ballistic resistance fabrics for textiles use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |