Drawing for METEVO

USPTO serial 79435183

METEVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METEVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kumiko Ide

Kumiko Ide Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 505Washington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Bending machines; metalworking machines; punching presses for metalworking; mechanical presses for metalworking; metal forming machines; metal cutting machines; planing machines for metalworking; drilling machines for metalworking; perforating machines for metalworking; bending machines for metalworking; milling machines for metalworking; shaping machines for metalworkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 16, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance