USPTO serial 79435221
WAKE-UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with WAKE-UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard G. Topolewski
Richard G. Topolewski Strong IP LLC5684 North Rainbow LaneWaterford, MI 48329United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Instant noodles; instant pho, being Vietnamese instant noodles; instant rice noodles; instant vermicelli; instant cooking noodles; instant rice; macaroni; flat rice noodles; instant porridge; meal kits consisting primarily of instant noodles, sold with a packet of vegetables, meat, and a hotpot-flavored soup base, the noodles being the main component; noodles; spaghetti; rice noodles; rice vermicelli; rice flour sticks, being dried rice-based noodles; wheat flour sticks, being dried wheat-based noodles; edible rice paper; rice-based snack food; frozen noodles; fish sauce; soy sauce; sauces, namely, savory sauces used as condiments; condiments, namely, chili condiments; seasonings; ketchup; chili sauce; seasoning powder; salad dressings; mayonnaise; satay sauces; oyster sauce; mustard; satay sauces based on scallop; sauces based on fermented bean curd; chili vinegar; rice seasoning; himalayan pink salt and black pepper seasoning mix; noodle-based prepared meals; cereal-based snack food; processed cereals; coffee; coffee-based foods, namely, coffee-based beverages; tea; tea-based foods, namely, tea-based beverages; green tea; herbal tea, not for medical purposes; bibimbap, being cooked rice mixed with vegetables, meat, and savory sauces used as condiments; kimbap; spring rolls; wontons; jiaozi; mandu, being Korean-style dumplings; baozi; confectionery made of sugar | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic coffee-flavored beverages, non-alcoholic tea-flavored beverages, and non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; non-alcoholic bird's nest drinks in the nature of water-based beverages, not for medical purposes; bird's nest-based beverages, being non-alcoholic, in the nature of water-based beverages; soft drinks; energy drinks, not for medical purposes; syrups for making non-alcoholic fruit-flavored beverages; mineral water; bottled drinking water; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea, coffee, and fruit; beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |