Drawing for QUICKFIT SNAPCONNECT

USPTO serial 79435279

QUICKFIT SNAPCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 660Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHNELL, BENJAMIN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with QUICKFIT SNAPCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Nocilly

David L. Nocilly Bond Schoeneck & King PLLCOne Lincoln CenterSyracuse, NY 13202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Couplings of metal for liquid-tight tubes, pipes, pneumatic hoses, and hydraulic hoses.ACTIVE—
017Non-metal couplings for liquid-tight tubes, pipes, pneumatic hoses, and hydraulic hoses.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2026GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2026GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2026CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 30, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance