USPTO serial 79435323
R REGINA TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with R REGINA TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Prototype fabrication of new products for others; 3D reproduction services, namely, Custom 3D printing of prototypes for others; processing of plastic, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and polyetherimide materials; processing of raw materials, namely, distillation of recycled raw materials; metal treating, being forging; manufacturing of custom moulds for industrial use; custom assembling in the nature of custom manufacturing of plastic and composite injection-moulded parts for others; custom manufacturing of moulded components in the nature of plastic injection-moulded parts for others; wood turning services; metal treatment, namely, processing of metal surfaces by precision grinding and abrasive polishing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design of prototypes; industrial design of 3D models for 3D printing; design of computer-simulated models; graphic pattern design; computer-aided design of molds; material testing; product testing in the nature of component testing; testing of new products; testing, authenticating and quality control, namely, product quality testing and authentication in the field of motorsport and automotive; product quality checking and testing services; technical testing services, product safety testing services; design and testing for new product development; quality control for others; quality control for others, namely, quality testing; quality control for others, namely, quality assessment; quality control for others, namely, quality control testing; product testing; quality control for others, namely, quality control testing of products; quality control for others, namely, conducting of quality control tests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |