USPTO serial 79435333
RM GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RM GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
edward p kelly
edward p kelly Tiajoloff & Kelly LLP45 Rockefeller Center20th floorNew York, NY 10111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Crushing machines for industrial purposes, in particular, for crushing plants; replacement parts for crushing machines, namely, wear segments; sifting installations, namely, sifting machines; stone-working machines; conveyors being machines and conveyor belts; none of the aforementioned goods in relation to cranes, hoists and winches, or their accessories, parts or components | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded software for operating crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors; measuring devices, namely, electric and optical sensors for crushing plants, screening plants, and conveyor systems; scales for crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors; none of the aforementioned goods in relation to cranes, hoists and winches, or their accessories, parts or components | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of crushing machines; rental of crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors; none of the aforementioned services in relation to cranes, hoists and winches, or their accessories, parts or components | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the operation, development, production, repair, maintenance, sales and marketing of crushing machines, screening plants and conveyor systems; none of the aforementioned services in relation to cranes, hoists and winches, or their accessories, parts or components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Science and technology services relating to crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors, namely, scientific research and development; research and development of technology in the field of crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors; technological consultancy relating to crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors, namely, engineering consultation; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for operating crushing machines, sifting installations and conveyors; none of the aforementioned services in relation to cranes, hoists and winches, or their accessories, parts or components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUBBLE MASTER HMH GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RM GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |