USPTO serial 79435495
ELB-KEHREN PRECISION GRINDING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ELB-KEHREN PRECISION GRINDING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham Barclay Damon LLP160 Federal Street, 10th FloorBoston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Grinding machines, namely creep feed grinding machines, profile grinding machines and surface grinding machines; machine tools, namely, grinding machines for metal, ceramic and composite working tools, being parts of machines, namely, grinding wheels and tool bits for grinding machines; linear guides, namely, linear motion guides being parts of machines; linear guidance systems comprised of linear motion guides, guide rails, bearing blocks, and linear motors for machines; controllers for machines, motors and engines, namely, electronic controllers for controlling grinding machines; grinding centres being metalworking machines; grinding centres being grinding machines for processing ceramics and composites; grinding spindles being machine parts; flat and profile metal, ceramic and composite grinding machines; Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; grindstones and rings for grinding machines; machines for metal, glass, ceramic, plastic and semiconductor working and processing, and machine tools therefor; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; machine parts for all the aforesaid machines, included in this class; accessories for machines, in particular lapping, fine grinding and polishing discs, grinding discs, lapping arbors, lapping rings, and polishing rollers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Machinery installation, maintenance and repair; installation, maintenance and repair of grinding machines, machine tools, tools, machine parts, linear guides, linear guidance systems and control mechanisms for machines, engines and motors. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elb-Schliff Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ELB-KEHREN GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ELB-KEHREN PRECISION GRINDING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |