USPTO serial 79435520
DUOCLOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAKESLEE, RICHARD A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUOCLOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Locks of metal, other than electric; metal spring locks, other than electric; metal locks for frames, other than electric; metal padlocks, other than electronic; keys of metal; door bolts of metal; safes; safety doors of metal; lock bolts; cylinder locks of metal; metal barrels for locks; lock elements of metal; strike plates of metal for locks; metal cylinders for security locks. | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric locks; electronic locks; connected locks; fingerprint reading locks for doors; electromagnetic locks; biometric locks; wireless locks; electric door locks; mechanical locks (electric, not of metal); wireless lock assemblies; electronic access-control devices for doors; encoded key cards. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 25, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |