Drawing for BIAGINI

USPTO serial 79435551

BIAGINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIAGINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebeccah Gan

Rebeccah Gan Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018All-purpose carrying bags; briefcases; small bags for men; handbags; leather travelling bag sets; leather shoulder belts; haversacks; clutches; wallets; purses; suitcases; attaché cases; trunks being luggage; backpacks; luggage; key casesACTIVE—
025Waist beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 12, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance