USPTO serial 79435586
SFERA BOARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SFERA BOARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Dunlap
Thomas M. Dunlap Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC211 Church St., SELeesburg, VA 20175United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Video game apparatus, namely, video game machines; balance boards for gymnastics; skateboards; surf boards. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |