Drawing for SEEBEE

USPTO serial 79435674

SEEBEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIGAN, MATTHEW M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEEBEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET G RICCIUTI

JANET G RICCIUTI JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI PC2003 KALORAMA ROAD NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for mobile devices for use in navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and mapping; downloadable software applications for use in navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and mapping; electronic positioning apparatus and instruments; downloadable software for social networking; downloadable interactive mobile applications and downloadable software for transmitting cartographic information, information with respect to navigation, traffic, meteorology and points of interest to a network of usersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 29, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2025LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance