Drawing for ATLAS ELEKTRONIK

USPTO serial 79435737

ATLAS ELEKTRONIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATLAS ELEKTRONIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle K. Muñoz

Danielle K. Muñoz Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels; apparatus for locomotion by water, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels; unmanned underwater vehicles, namely, underwater vehicles in the nature of submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles, remotely steered underwater vehicles and autonomously operating underwater vehicles and surface vessels; remotely controlled underwater vehicles, namely, underwater vehicles in the nature of submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles, remotely steered underwater vehicles and autonomously operating underwater vehicles and surface vessels; autonomously operating underwater vehicles, namely, underwater vehicles in the nature of submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles, remotely steered underwater vehicles and autonomously operating underwater vehicles and surface vessels; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels for detecting and destroying mines; underwater running bodies being structural parts for submarines, underwater vehicles and surface vessels; target-seeking underwater vehicles, namely, target seeking submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels with explosive charges; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels with active sonar; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels with acoustic transponder system; underwater vehicles, namely, submarines, unmanned underwater vehicles and surface vessels with optical fibers for data transmission; pressure bodies being structural parts for underwater vehicles; ships; underwater floating bodies being structural parts for vehicles; manned underwater vehicles, namely, manned submarines, underwater vehicles and surface vessels; autonomous underwater vehicles and surface vessels for investigations of the seabed; steering gears for ships; remotely operated vehicles for underwater inspections; underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) for transport.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance