USPTO serial 79435753
PAPERFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- INGRAM, KYLE G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAPERFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
Daniel E. Kattman Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.1000 N. Water StreetSuite 1700Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission and retransmission of documents, agreements, forms, website document templates, website agreement forms, transaction data, and related communications via computer and communication networks; electronic transmission of facsimile documents via computer networks; providing communication services via a global computer network and the Internet, namely, facilitating the electronic exchange, signing, and completion of documents, agreements, and forms between businesses and their customers; secure electronic transmission of documents, agreements, transaction data, and authentication information over computer networks for facilitating electronic signatures and digital transaction workflows; transmission of document-related information, authentication requests, and transaction communications by telephone, including automated voice bots and IVR (interactive voice response) systems for facilitating electronic agreements and workflows; telecommunications consulting services in the field of electronic document workflows, data input systems, and interactive voice response (IVR) integration for facilitating digital transactions and communications; internet-based telecommunication services, namely, providing automated communications, authentication prompts, document notifications, and transaction status updates via voice bots, IVR, SMS, and digital messaging systems to facilitate electronic signing and workflow completion; electronic transmission of written messages, namely, transaction notifications and signature requests; short message service (SMS) transmission services, namely, sending transaction notifications, authentication codes, signature requests, and document status updates to users via mobile communication networks for facilitating electronic document workflows and digital transactions; electronic transmission of messages, images, data, and documents for others via computer networks; providing access to global computer networks for the transmission, updating, storage, and sharing of data, documents, files, information, and multimedia content for others; automatic electronic transmission of data via telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |