Drawing for NEKO

USPTO serial 79435983

NEKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy C. Bradley

Timothy C. Bradley Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C.400 West Maple Road, Suite 350Birmingham, MI 48009United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Backhoe buckets; backhoe loaders; earth moving machines, namely, backhoes; buckets for earth moving machines; compact dozer loaders being earth moving machines; crawler-tracked loaders; earth compacting machines; earth moving machines, namely, earth haulers; excavating machines; front-end loaders; hand-held battery actuated hydraulic crimp tools; hydraulic excavators; hydraulic presses for metalworking; loader buckets for excavators; loaders being earth moving machines; machines for cutting and splitting logs for firewood; sawmills; skid-steer loadersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 19, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance