Drawing for AIPAVAN

USPTO serial 79435998

AIPAVAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, REBECCA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with AIPAVAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George W. Lewis

George W. Lewis WHDA, LLP8500 Leesburg Pike, Ste. 7500Tysons, VA 22182United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Rental of computers; providing computer programs on data networks; computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; research in the field of artificial intelligence; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; artificial intelligence consultancy.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2026ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2026CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 17, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 17, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance