USPTO serial 79436019
COGNIGY NEXUS LLM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COGNIGY NEXUS LLM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Roylance
Katherine Roylance Sanders IP Law140 West Union Avenue, # 205140 North Union Avenue, # 205Farmington, UT 84025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Adaptive software; computer software, recorded; artificial intelligence software; digital telephone platforms and software; machine learning software; industrial process control software; industrial automation software; artificial intelligence and machine learning software; software converters of natural language into machine executable commands; speech recognition software; voice recognisers; speech analytics software; speech synthesizers; speech recognition apparatus; speech processing equipment; voice processing systems; computer chatbot software for simulating conversations. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing internet chatrooms; providing voice chat services; providing internet chat lines; chatroom services for social networking; providing access to internet chatrooms; electronic communication by means of chatrooms, chat lines and internet forums; electronic exchange of messages via chat lines, chatrooms and internet forums; virtual chatrooms established via text messaging; provision of telecommunications connections for telephone chat lines; providing online chatrooms for the transmission of messages, comments and multimedia content among users. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software; computer software consultancy; software creation; software development; software customisation services; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for deep learning; software development, programming and implementation; programming of software for internet portals, chatrooms, chat lines and internet forums. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |