Drawing for SUPAIR

USPTO serial 79436463

SUPAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 802
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REID, CAILE MAUREEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Drones; civilian drones; camera drones; delivery drones; air vehicles for transport and space vehicles; military drones; aerial conveyors; drones for monitoring; drones for surveillance; firefighting drones; electric propulsion systems for aircraft, namely, drone propellers, wings for airplanes, wings for drones; none of the foregoing including manual air gliding or kite conveyanceACTIVE—
039Rental of security drones; rental of photography drones; rental of surveillance drones; aircraft handling being aircraft parking, aircraft piloting; drone handling being piloting of civilian drones, delivery of goods by drone; aircraft rental; air transport; air transport and distribution being freight shipping servicesACTIVE—
042New product design services, namely, drone design; new product design services, namely, aircraft design services; design of computer programs and software relating to drones; design of computer programs and software relating to aircraft; aerial surveying; engineering services; new product design services, namely, design of electronic integrated circuit boards; design of computer programs and computer software for use with aircraft ground systems for controlling aircraft; new product design services, namely, design of electric propulsion systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2026GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 28, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance