USPTO serial 79436502
FOLLIGEN-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLLENKARK, RHONNA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOLLIGEN-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rui Geissler
Rui Geissler Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1400Arlington, VA 22201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cuticle removing preparations; non-medicated toners for scalp care; dry shampoos; non-medicated cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; non-medicated scalp treatment creams; shampoos; hair masks; hair essences, namely, flower essences for cosmetic purposes; hair conditioners; hair care preparations. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |