USPTO serial 79436957
AI FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AI FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet W. Cho
Janet W. Cho Williams Mullen200 South 10th Streetc/o IP DocketingRichmond, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for running cloud computing based applications. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Leasing cloud storage facilities for use as a data center for others; server hosting; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for machine learning, cryptographic computing, three-dimensional modeling of physical objects and data analysis; design and development of computer software, databases, computer software for providing web services and cloud computing infrastructure; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating and developing computer databases for others to be used on cloud based servers; providing online non-downloadable artificial intelligence (AI) software for use in large language models for computer software code generation; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software featuring graphics processing unit (GPU) technology for use in artificial intelligence (AI) model training, and deployment; Providing token-based temporary use of graphics processing unit (GPU) computing software and computer servers for artificial intelligence (AI) processing, model training, and deployment; advisory services in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; Computer services, namely, cloud computing hosting and web hosting services for hosting software, websites, and other computer applications of others; Management services for data center networks, namely, leasing of data center facilities; rental of web servers and co-location servers for containerized data centres for others. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |