Drawing for PROMAX INO FASTER, STRONGER, SMARTER

USPTO serial 79437120

PROMAX INO FASTER, STRONGER, SMARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 645Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 645: Status 645 means the USPTO mailed a final refusal maintaining at least one objection to your application. You can respond, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or allow the application to abandon.

Need help with PROMAX INO FASTER, STRONGER, SMARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis J. Levy

Louis J. Levy Symbus Law Group PLLC1750 H Street NWSuite 360Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, self-contained, portable, handheld medical devices for topical intranasal administration, namely, dual-chamber nasal spray dispensers that generate nitric oxide locally within the nasal cavity through the chemical reaction of two liquid precursor solutions upon actuation, for nasal and sinus care and the symptomatic relief of nasal congestion, nasal itching, and runny nose; intended for self-administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 2, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 19, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance