USPTO serial 79437229
UDR AURORA CX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UDR AURORA CX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Priscilla Lauren Speer
Priscilla Lauren Speer Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs Road Suite 100Henderson, NV 89014United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus for medical purposes; X-ray diagnostic apparatus; medical apparatus and instruments for diagnostic use, namely, apparatus for medical diagnostic testing in the fields of cancer or other tissue-based diagnostic testing, cytology and cell-based testing; medical apparatus and instruments for diagnostic use, namely, digital radiology equipment including a bed as a component; magnetic resonance imaging apparatus for medical purposes; ultrasound apparatus for medical purposes; tomographs for medical purposes; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, medical and electromedical magnetic resonance imaging machines and their structural components, computed tomography machines and their structural components, digital medical X-ray imaging apparatus and their structural components, digital radiology apparatus and their structural components, medical devices for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and tumors and their structural components, medical imaging devices which employ image reconstruction technology and their structural components; X-ray apparatus for medical purposes; radiotherapy apparatus; radiological apparatus for medical purposes; beds specially made for medical purposes; medical X-ray apparatus; medical diagnostic apparatus for detecting cancer; none of the foregoing for use with mammography apparatus, Medical diagnostic testing equipment for cell analysis, single-photon emission computed tomography scanners and computed tomography diagnostic scanners of the brain, heart, blood flow, bones, kidneys, thyroid and tumor localization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |