Drawing for PROGUARDJOINT

USPTO serial 79437273

PROGUARDJOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALBANO, ASHLEY C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGUARDJOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bridget Hoy

Bridget Hoy Lewis Rice LLC600 Washington Avenue, Suite 2500St. Louis, MO 63101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal building materials for flooring namely, metal formwork joint systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid, namely, bolts of metal, plates of metal, sleeves of metal, headed anchors of metal, threaded bars, rivets of metal, steel bars; metal formwork for flooring; metal joints for construction of floors; screed rails made of metal; metal profiles for use in the construction of floors; metal formwork for use in the construction of floors; metal floor jointsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 30, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 30, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance