USPTO serial 79437307
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Katz
Daniel Katz Law Offices of Daniel Katz, Esq. LLC121 S. Broad St, Suite 1300Philadelphia, PA 19107United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Corrugated cardboard making machines; engraving machines; computerized engraving machines; marking machines for industrial purposes; machines for geological, mining and ore exploration, namely, ore treating machines; labellers, namely, industrial printing machines for printing on labels; sifting installations; 3D printers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |