USPTO serial 79437360
SYSPARENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RILEY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SYSPARENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
edward p kelly
edward p kelly Tiajoloff & Kelly LLP45 Rockefeller Center20th floorNew York, NY 10111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for analyzing, manipulating, documenting, explaining, translating, transforming and reprogramming other software and source code, including the conversion of software or source code from one programming language into another. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultancy and advisory services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting seminars in the field of developing software; training in the operation of software systems; education, namely, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of creating the documentation of source codes and analyzing, manipulating documenting, explaining, translating, transforming and reprogramming other software and source code, including the conversion of software or source code from one programming language into another. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design for others; maintenance of computer software; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for analyzing, manipulating, documenting, explaining, translating, transforming ,reprogramming and improving the value of other software and creating documentation for source code for others, including the conversion of software or source code from one programming language into another; providing design and maintenance of computer software for the documentation of source codes; computer software consultancy. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |