Drawing for DYNAMIC E FLOW

USPTO serial 79437407

DYNAMIC E FLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIC E FLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Oliner

345 Grove St., 2nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric motors, other than for land vehicles; electric motors for marine vehicles; electric motors for machines; electric generators; generators for land vehicles; generators for marine vehicles.ACTIVE—
012Electric motors for motor cars; electric motors for land vehicles.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 14, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2026LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 21, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance