USPTO serial 79437570
CHARGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials; moving and handling equipment; engines, machine parts and controls for the operation of machines and engines; machines, namely, crushes, impact mills, breakers, pulverisers, mixers and blenders and parts therefor, for industrial and commercial applications; machines for separating target materials from mixtures of materials; screening machines; hoppers; mechanical discharging hoppers; vibratory screening machines; milling grinding motors; milling tools being parts of machines; milling machines; centrifugal mills; rolling mills; ball mills; grinding machines for use in the manufacture and treatment of cement; conveyors being machines; suction pumps; air suction machines; vacuum pumps. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |