Drawing for KOACH DUET

USPTO serial 79437700

KOACH DUET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUK, HAE P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOACH DUET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Subaru Ryan Kanesaka

Subaru Ryan Kanesaka Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill Rd, Suite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laminar flow cabinets for laboratory useACTIVE—
011Air purifying units; ventilation apparatus, namely, air cleaning apparatus, clean room installation air blowers, air ventilation apparatus, and filters for use with apparatus for ventilatingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2026CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 5, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 17, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 4, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 3, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance