Drawing for MADLY IN BLOOM

USPTO serial 79437748

MADLY IN BLOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADLY IN BLOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Accessories for apparel, sewing articles and decorative textile articles, namely, haberdashery bows, ribbons and bows, not of paper, for gift wrapping, ribbons of textile materials, haberdashery ribbons; charms, namely, charms for shoes, decorative backpack charms, cellular phone accessory charms, charms for eyewear, purse charms; hair ornaments in the form of combs and hair wraps; hair fastening articles being hair clips, hair clamps and hair nets, and false hair; artificial fruit, flowers and vegetables.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 29, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2025LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance