Drawing for GENOA INSTRUMENTS

USPTO serial 79437792

GENOA INSTRUMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAINES, LEAH R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENOA INSTRUMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital Imaging apparatus comprised of semiconductor-controlled micromirrors; optical sensors; optical enhancers in the nature of optical lens sights; optical viewing screens in the nature of optical code readers; optical lens blanks; optical apparatus, instruments, enhancers and correctors, namely, microscopes and their parts, optical detectors, optical readers, optical glasses, optical lenses, optical filters; microscopes; microscope condensers; biological microscopes; lenses for microscopes; prisms for microscopes.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance