Drawing for EASYAUDIT POWERED BY AI

USPTO serial 79438026

EASYAUDIT POWERED BY AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 645Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOX III, LYAL L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 645: Status 645 means the USPTO mailed a final refusal maintaining at least one objection to your application. You can respond, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or allow the application to abandon.

Need help with EASYAUDIT POWERED BY AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Flavia Campbell

Flavia Campbell Attorney of record, Arizona Bar member1850 North Central Avenue Suite 1400Phoenix, AZ 85004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy in the field of cybersecurity; Business consultancy relating to regulatory compliance; Business risk assessment services; Business risk management consulting and advice; Business risk management services; Consulting and advisory services in the field of business risk managementACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software platforms for use in data privacy protection by managing online privacy policies and privacy settings; Providing online non-downloadable software for use in analyzing cybersecurity risk and assessing compliance with cybersecurity and data privacy standards and regulatory requirements; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for use in the detection, analysis, mitigation, resolution, and assessment of, and protection against, cybersecurity threats; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in data security; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in verifying data policy compliance of third-party user data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in computer data privacy protection and for provide related assessments and reports; Technology consultancy in the field of cybersecurity; all of the above excluding software for performing inventories of computer hardware or installed software and IT asset management softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance