Drawing for MEDYRIA

USPTO serial 79438093

MEDYRIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, HANNAH B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDYRIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samantha N. Skains-Menchaca

Samantha N. Skains-Menchaca Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP214 North Tryon Street, Suite 3700Charlotte, NC 28202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for receiving, processing, and assessing biological, physiological, and medical data and information; downloadable software for diagnosing medical conditionsACTIVE—
010Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments; cardiovascular devices in the nature of medical instruments for cardiovascular diagnostics; catheters; patient monitoring sensors for medical use, namely, for measuring speed of blood flow; blood flow measuring devices for medical use; monitoring devices for medical use, namely, for monitoring blood pressure and blood flow; monitoring devices for medical use, namely, patient monitoring sensors and alarmsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of medical devices development and manufacturing; scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of integrated system architecture that allows for the real-time monitoring and reporting of highly interactive and customizable medical applications; development and testing of computer software and computer programs in the field of computational methods and algorithmsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2025SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance