Drawing for MONTENA

USPTO serial 79438152

MONTENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CERDA, VICTOR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Weissman

Peter S. Weissman Blank Rome LLP1825 I St NWWashington, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007High-voltage generators; electrostatic generators; bioreactors for manufacturing biopharmaceuticals; electromechanical machines for food preparation; industrial processing machines incorporating electromagnetic pulse generators; industrial machines for producing activated waterACTIVE—
009Scientific, research, measuring, detecting, testing, inspecting apparatus and instruments for electromagnetic pulse generation, measurement and testing; electromagnetic measuring and testing machines and instruments; electronic testing and monitoring apparatus, namely electromagnetic monitors and sensors; electromagnetic field measurement equipment; electric and magnetic field sensors and voltage sensors; antennas; fiber optic couplings; couplings for electric cables, namely electric couplings; electric wires and cables; fiber-optic cables; coaxial cables; electronic circuits; electromagnetic pulse generators for scientific, industrial and testing applications; downloadable software for analyzing magnetic field measurements; downloadable software for assessing the immunity of electronic equipment against electromagnetic disturbances; pulse generators for plasma generation in industrial processes; electrical stimulation systems for industrial processes; electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing equipment, systems and simulators; downloadable software for electromagnetic field measurement, analysis and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing; downloadable software for managing and controlling pulse generators; downloadable software for monitoring, analyzing and controlling electromagnetic pulsesACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research, design, development and testing in the field of pulsed power and electromagnetic systems; industrial design services, namely designing of machines, apparatus, and instruments; quality control services for others; technical design services, namely assessment and consulting services relating to pulsed power and electromagnetic systems; design, development and updating of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 7, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance