USPTO serial 79438168
ASPIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASPIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould, P.C.150 South 5th StreetP.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile application software for managing mobile telecommunications accounts, including activation, billing, plan management and customer support; Downloadable software for the provision and management of mobile and wireless telecommunications services; Downloadable software for transmitting, receiving and managing voice, text messages and data communications; Downloadable computer software for authentication, security and encryption in telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; none of the foregoing being or including broadcasting services, streaming of audio, video, or multimedia content via the Internet or electronic communications networks, video on demand transmission services, or transmission services for the purpose of broadcasting or streaming audio or video content to end users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for managing telecommunications services, billing, provisioning, customer relationship management and subscriber authentication; Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring software platforms for the provision and management of mobile and wireless telecommunications services; Cloud computing services featuring software for telecommunications network management and service orchestration; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for managing mobile telecommunications accounts; Hosting of software platforms for mobile telecommunications service providers; Computer security services, namely, monitoring telecommunications networks for detecting unauthorized access and data breaches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |