Drawing for R-DRIVE

USPTO serial 79438301

R-DRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABID, NABEELA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R-DRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Geissler

Martin R. Geissler Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of machines, namely, drill chucks for power drills; drill chucks for power drills; power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, boring tools; power operated tools, namely, power drills; machine tool holdersACTIVE—
008Hand-operated boring tools, namely, hand-operated hand drills; parts of hand-operated tools, namely, drill chucks for hand-operated tools; hand-operated tensioner tools, namely, hand tools being clamps; hand-operated tightener tools, namely, wrenchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance