Drawing for KATSU

USPTO serial 79438322

KATSU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).

Status 686: Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.

Need help with KATSU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joanna M. Myers

Joanna M. Myers Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC450 W. Fourth St.Royal Oak, MI 48067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Assessing information technology security and vulnerability of computers and networks, namely, computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; computer performance testing; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer software design; computer technology consultancy services; computing services, namely, computer software testing and computer software consultancy in the field of financial services; consultancy in the field of computer system analysis; consultancy relating to computer database software programs; consulting services for others in the field of design of computer software testing methods; consulting services in the field of computer systems testing; consulting services in the fields of database testing, database migration, and database quality testing; design and testing of new products for others; hosting a website that provides virtual computer environments through cloud computing; hosting software of others on a virtual private server; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for use in computer software testing in connection with quality assurance of the services of others in the computer technology industry; providing quality control consultancy for the computer software development industry; providing quality control services for the computer software development industry; security testing of computer software applications; software as a service (SaaS) provider services in the nature of hosting software for use by others for use in the collaborative development of software; software testing engineering; technological planning and consulting services in the field of design and integration of digital infrastructure for smart cities; testing of computer programs; testing of computer software; testing of new products for others; testing, analysis and evaluation of the services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the services of others to determine conformity with industry standards; web site load testing services; web site usability testing services; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for robotic process automation of data entry and systems integration tasks in the field of quality assurance; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for robotic process automation of tasks for use in business workflows; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for computer-aided diagnostic software testing for use in the field of product development and quality improvement of softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance