USPTO serial 79438404
HEY MELA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HEY MELA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany Kaur Singh
Brittany Kaur Singh Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern BoulevardRoslyn, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pregnancy test kits for home use; pregnancy testing preparations for home use; biological, diagnostic and immunological goods for in-vitro and in vivo use for medical purposes, namely, medical diagnostic immunoassays, immunoassay reagents for medical use, reagents for genetic testings and for use in automated analysis systems for clinical diagnostics, immunological radiopharmaceutical imaging and detection agents for medical diagnostic use, contrasting agents for medical diagnostic use. | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Diagnostic apparatus for pregnancy testing, namely, medical diagnostic apparatus for detecting pregnancy. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |